Codewerk.
Get a quote

// Software · Automation

Stop doing by hand what software can do

Imports, exports, invoicing, notifications and reporting — automated with reliable jobs and monitoring that tells you if anything fails.

// What you get

What we automate

Recurring tasks

Turn manual, repetitive steps into scheduled, reliable jobs.

Data sync

Keep shop, ERP and tools in sync without manual copying.

Invoicing & documents

Generate and dispatch invoices and documents automatically.

Notifications

Trigger emails, messages and updates on the events that matter.

Reporting

Scheduled reports and KPIs delivered where your team works.

Monitoring

Alerts the moment a job fails, so nothing breaks silently.

// Why it matters

Automation that just runs

Repetitive manual work is slow, expensive and error-prone. Codewerk Solutions automates it — imports, exports, invoicing, notifications, data sync and reporting — with reliable scheduled jobs, system integration and monitoring. We build the automation to handle edge cases and alert you the moment something needs attention.

The result is a business that runs more of itself — freeing your team from routine work to focus on customers, growth and the things software can't do.

// In detail

Technology, performance and SEO

What we actually do under the hood — so you can judge the work, not just the promise.

Technology & architecture

Every task becomes a message on a queue: 'export invoice 4711'. A worker takes it and either succeeds or fails loudly with the message preserved for a retry. Every job is idempotent, because a retry must not send the invoice twice — that is how customers end up with three copies of the same dunning letter.

Observability

Automation you cannot observe is a liability, not an asset. We log every execution, alert on failures, and — crucially — alert on absence: a job that stopped being scheduled at all looks exactly like a job that is idle. A dead-man's switch catches what error monitoring never will.

Where automation pays first

Order-to-ERP push, invoice generation and dispatch, stock and price sync, low-stock alerts to purchasing, dunning, and the reports someone currently assembles by hand every Monday morning. Each one is a recurring human check replaced by a job that never gets tired.

// FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Yes, and we do — it is powerful and already paid for. But it is event-driven and stateless: it cannot loop, wait for an external system, or run a nightly reconciliation against your ERP. For those, you need a worker, not a clever workaround.

The message stays on the queue and retries with backoff. Nothing is lost, nothing is duplicated, and you get an alert if the backlog grows beyond a threshold you set.

Because we alert when an expected run does not happen, not only when one fails. The dangerous failure is silence, and it is the one most monitoring setups miss entirely.

The boring thing somebody does every single day, not the impressive thing you do at quarter end. A five-minute task repeated daily by two people is worth more than a two-hour task done four times a year, and it is easier to build because everyone already knows the rules by heart. Start there, prove it, then move up.

Usually not, if you count only the time saved. Do the arithmetic honestly: twelve runs a year against the cost of building it and then maintaining it forever. The exception is when the manual version is dangerous rather than slow — a monthly price import where one wrong column costs real money. Then you are buying correctness, not hours.

For simple, low-volume connections between two SaaS tools, yes — and then you should. It gets expensive or fragile when the volume climbs, when the logic needs a real transaction across systems, or when a failure has to retry safely without duplicating an order. The tell is a twenty-step scenario nobody in the company dares to touch.

Yes, but differently. Nobody should re-check every record — that is the work you just removed. Somebody does need to own the exception queue: the twenty rows out of ten thousand that did not match. Automation is good at the rule and bad at the surprise, and a job that quietly skips the odd cases is worse than no automation at all.

Let's talk about your project

Send a short brief — we reply within one business day.